I had gone to Michigan State as a
Spanish major. I had studied Spanish all through junior high and for five
semesters in high school. I had a gift for the language and I liked the
culture. So it seemed obvious that my career track was teaching Spanish. Like I
say, growing up in the shadow of the oldest teacher’s college in Texas and in a
family with lots of teachers, I assumed teaching was what adults did. Smart
adults, that is.
As it turned out, Spanish was okay
but the thought of spending my life teaching it lost all appeal. It seemed that
my classmates, those who were not planning to teach Spanish, were only there to
fulfill a language requirement and had heard that Spanish was the easiest thing
going. So the professors were always swimming upstream, trying to generate some
enthusiasm. I didn’t want to do that. By the time I went home that summer, one
of my goals was to find a new major.
I studied the course catalog so much
you would have thought I was going to have an exam. Much of the reading I did
every night at work was an attempt to narrow down my field of interests. I read
psychology, sociology, history, classics. I did not even consider the hard
sciences. I had excellent grades in all my science classes in high school, but
I knew my mind did not work that way. And I would do anything to avoid any more
math classes.
MSU had a number of innovative
programs, but none of them appealed to me. My best friends Steve and Randy listened patiently
to all my fretting, but eventually even they told me to just flip a coin or
open the catalogue and go with whatever page I landed on.
I did not have to declare a major until I was a junior, which meant I had
a year to think about this. Patience, however, is not a strength. I may take
what seems like forever to make up my mind, but when the time comes, it sometimes appears to others to be a bit of a snap decision and I am reluctant to revisit it. This, by the
way, is not a good quality. In years to come I would realize it to be a
character defect.
Sidebar joke: I don’t have character defects, just charming personal
idiosyncrasies.
Sidebar serious: One of which is using humor to avoid facing facts.
Anyway, I kept reading like mad and pondering the possibilities. One
thing that was fairly clear was that I expected to spend my life in academia.
So I was not looking for a career; I had the career picked out. I was just
looking for subject matter.
At some point, I remembered that I had actually taken a series of tests
the summer after my junior year in high school, tests designed to help me know
what career would fit me best. I had put that out of mind for two reasons. One,
the graduate student who administered the tests as partial fulfillment of some
requirement for his master’s degree in education, had mistakenly let me see the
hard data from the testing. He was supposed to give me the interpretation and
be done with it. But I saw it all, saw my IQ test results, which pleased me,
and also saw a graph that showed that my answers to the tests all followed the
typical curve for a girl and not for a boy.
I was horrified. There it was in black or white, I was a homosexual, a
queer. It would go on my permanent record! I was relieved to find out that this
was all confidential, that nothing went on my permanent record and that the
results were kept totally anonymous, even in his final report for his
professor. He said nothing about the girl-curve, but it ruined my week.
The only glimmer of hope for me was that the tests showed very
clearly and strongly that the thing for
which I was best suited was ministry. I laughed and explained to him that I
didn’t even believe in God. That neither surprised nor impressed him. The test,
he pointed out, showed that I had good empathy skills, good language skills,
was compassionate and a good listener and so on. In combination, these qualities
pointed to a career in ministry, but they could easily fit into a counseling
profile.
I thanked him very much, hoped that the foolish ministry outlook was a
sign that the girl-curve was also an error, and did my best to forget the whole thing.
Until that summer when I was looking for a major; it came back with a
flash.
My spring term of freshman year I
had taken an Introduction to Christianity course. I thought (a) it would be
simple because I thought I knew everything about the Bible and Christianity
already, and (b) since it met in a classroom in my dorm, I wouldn’t have to trek
across the enormous campus to get to and from that class at least.
It turned out to be a fascinating
class. Instead of being Bible for Morons, what I assumed any Introduction to
Christianity would be, it was more about church history, how the scriptures
came to be written and the canon formed, how various questions arose in the
early community about the nature of Jesus and the organization of the church
and so on. It was totally new territory, and I found it fascinating. The fact
that I was an atheist or agnostic gave it the extra kink it needed to appeal to
me. Halfway through the summer, I decided to change my major to religious
studies when I returned to East Lansing in the fall.
At the time, there were about 45,000
students enrolled at MSU. The religious studies department – which was called
the religion department in those days – offered a major and hundreds of
students took their courses. But I think there were fewer than ten religion majors.
When I went in to talk to the
department chair about my interest in making religion my major, he was very
discouraging.
“Are you planning to go into
seminary?” he asked right off the bat.
“No,” I said succinctly.
“Why not?” he probed, bushy eyebrows
rising.
I pondered. Would it be okay to say
I didn’t believe in God, that I was only interested in religion as a field of
study like anthropology or Victorian literature?
“I can’t really see myself in a
seminary setting,” I offered cautiously.
He sat back and glared.
“There is no job market for religion
majors who are not going into seminary,” he pronounced with some finality.
That was the tone of the rest of our
conversation, but eventually he sighed and let me sign up as a religion major.
I had also become a member of the Honors College, one of the things that had
appealed to me in the MSU offerings. This meant I could, with the help of my
academic advisor, design my own program, ignore some general requirements and
such stuff. Since I was in Honors College, the chair had to be my advisor and
could not foist me off on one of the lowly assistant professors. I think this
was another reason he was not too happy.
To the best of my knowledge, I was the only religion major who was in the
Honors College the whole time I was at Michigan State. Most of the majors, and
lots of the students who just took the Bible courses, were planning on going
into ministry. They complained that they wanted courses on how to run a Sunday
school, not courses on the history of dogma. The department held out against
this, but it meant that I was very much the odd man out among the majors. Oddly
enough, I was appointed to the Students Advisory Committee my junior year and
became Chair of the Committee my senior year.
I enjoyed being a religious studies major a lot. As a result of my
classes, I came to appreciate church history and how things had developed. I
saw that Christianity was not a matter of just quoting texts at your opponents,
that the texts themselves had not even existed for decades while the church was
forming and that it was centuries before the church decided what was inspired scripture anyway. The Church of Christ had always acted as if
the New Testament as we had it had arrived on a silver platter the afternoon
after Jesus ascended into heaven, forty days after the resurrection. Obviously
this wasn’t true, but there was no serious reflection on how the books and
letters were written or chosen.
I was amazed to learn about things like the letters from the period of
the Apostolic Fathers, letters that overlapped with the time when the last
books in the New Testament were being written. I was even more amazed to learn
that the church described in those letters bore little relationship to the
Church of Christ and looked uncomfortably a lot like Roman Catholicism – which we had always
understood to be the archenemy of the Church of Christ – and Eastern Orthodoxy, which
was a venerable and rich tradition about which I knew exactly nothing.
I loved learning, I loved the stories, I loved the thinking processes and
the whole thing. I looked forward to teaching other poorly informed Christian
college students all about this in the future. I did not doubt that I would be
a lowly assistant professor or just a lecturer at some little no-name college
in some little no-name town. But it looked like exactly what I wanted to do.
So I began my sophomore year in fairly good spirits. At some point in the
fall term, I had sex a couple of times with the girl I had been dating off and
on since freshman year. We were at a party at her apartment and both pretty
drunk. It was fun for me, and I think for her, at least the second time. I
walked the mile or so back to my dorm through the cold dark night, smug as a
bug in a rug.
You might think that this episode and a few other sexplorations would
have encouraged me about the gay thing. But it did not. In fact, and I cannot
say why, as the winter term began, I became more and more depressed. Money was
very tight at home that year, and that was probably part of the problem. But I have
always been frugal to a fault, and I wasn’t terribly worried about that.
What I obsessed about was being queer, even though I don’t recall
obsessing about any particular guy. I was about to turn 20, and it was becoming
clear to me that this was no phase. I was homosexual. And to a Texas boy raised
in the Church of Christ, homosexuality was a dead end in 1970.
The Stonewall uprising had taken place in June of 1969 (69, get it?), but
it had not even blipped across my awareness. I did not know anyone who was
homosexual, at least I did not know that they were. (I later discovered that I
did know some, including the girl I had been dating and with whom I had been
having sex.) I don’t think I had heard the word gay used in the new sense, but
I must have heard it. Having no live category to hang the term on, it slid
away.
I began to sleep a lot and skip classes. I didn’t drink much and had not
started doing drugs, which is a very good thing. Psychologically I was in
perfect shape to go into a drug-induced tail spin. I noticed, however, that my daydreams
were becoming self-destructive. At least I had that much going on, some self-awareness.
To backtrack momentarily, at the beginning of winter term, I had gone to
Mass one Saturday evening with one of my roommates, John. We were probably on
our way to a party, and he wanted to go to the Saturday evening Mass so that he
could sleep late on Sunday morning. He was at the time a cultural
(Polish-American) Catholic. He would never miss Mass, but he was not too
confined by traditional Catholic moral teaching. He was perfectly capable of
pigeonholing his life this way.
While we were there, I read in the announcements that a class for people
interested in the teachings of the Catholic Church would begin a week later.
The class was required for non-Catholics preparing to marry a Catholic, but it
was open to anyone who was interested, no obligation, no cost. Just come for a
couple of hours on Monday nights and learn.
I thought this would be a good way to get to know what the Catholics had
to say for themselves. My courses in the religion department had shown me how
little I really knew about other traditions. Apparently what I had heard from
the Church of Christ, where we spent the entire
year of eighth grade Sunday School studying the evils of Catholicism,
was not all that reliable. And it was free!
I remember thinking that other churches and even the Hillel Center
probably had similar classes. I could take these classes on the side and
supplement my formal education. Sounded like a plan. So I decided to do it.
The Franciscan priest who taught the class was not the world’s best
teacher, maybe, but he was certainly engaging. I enjoyed the class, was not too
surprised to learn how wrong just about everything I had heard back in that Huntsville
Sunday School room had been, and I started reading everything I could get my hands
on. That was quite a bit, because this was a student parish. They had an
extensive paperback selection of Catholic literature, catechisms, Bible
studies, novels, lives of saints and so on.
During these weeks while my depression deepened and the world seemed to
grow darker around me, while I skipped all my regular classes, I kept going
every Monday night, through the winter cold, across campus to St. John Student
Center. Looking back on it, what happened was pretty inevitable. But it came as
a shock to me.
Back to the depression.
After a couple of weeks that felt like months, I realized that I needed
help and decided to go to the university counseling center. When I walked up to
the counter and asked to see someone, the young woman looked me over carefully
and asked, “Can it wait until tomorrow?” I can only imagine how bad I must have
looked.
“Sure,” I smiled, and she put me down for an initial interview the next
day.
The woman I met with was probably in her thirties, pleasant and
non-threatening. I thought I might as well start with the hard part.
“I’m homosexual,” I said, staring at the floor.
“Tell me about it,” she said.
And I did. For the next half hour or so I rambled on about my fantasies,
my fears, me confusion. She listened without seeming the least bit alarmed. I
don’t know if I had expected her to punch a button to call the campus cops and
have me hauled away or what. Instead she asked a few questions, calming me down
by her own calm, reassured me that this was not the end of the world and called
to set me up with a counselor whose office was closer to my dorm. I would meet
with him weekly.
The next day I started going back to class. I had been skipping so long
that when I went back to my Greek class, I was no longer sure which room it met
in. I stood in the corridor and waited for a familiar face to go in.
Surprisingly I did not fail anything, nor even seriously damage my grade point.
Maybe it had not been as long as it seemed to me. But getting back to class was
a step in the right direction.
The guy who became my counselor for the next six or eight weeks was
fantastic. He was what I would come to know was pretty Rogerian in his
approach: unconditional positive regard. He listened carefully and repeated
what I had said to make sure he understood it. He came across as genuinely
concerned for me, but he also came across as not worried about me. So I was
homosexual. I was also short. He was heterosexual and tall. Life was like that.
After the first session, I went home without the dark cloud over my head. And
it did not return. I was not only going to be okay, I already was okay. Just
the way I was.
I saw him once a week for the rest of the term. After a few weeks of
feeling sane, the God thing happened.
I had continued to attend Fr. Ed’s classes at St. John. This was the
spring of 1970, and the new Vatican II sacramentary (the book that has all the
prayers for Mass) was going to be taking effect at Easter. Mass had already
been in English for a while, and Fr. Ed suggested that those of us who had
never attended a full-blown Gregorian Latin Mass might want to go to the one
scheduled at the parish the following Saturday evening. The parish was taking
the opportunity to say goodbye to the old tradition respectfully (no one knew
at the time that resistance to the new Mass would mean that the old Mass never
completely went away), and the homily would be about the history of the development
of the Mass over the centuries and an explanation of how and why things were
changing while remaining essentially the same.
So the next Saturday found me sitting next to my roommate John again in
the big nave of St. John Student Parish.
I had enough Latin to be able to
follow more or less what was going on, assisted by the well-prepared program,
and I loved the music, the incense, the colors of the vestments, the whole
show. I also experienced a bit of what many people loved about the Gregorian
Mass. It was a great setting for personal reflection. Unlike the English Mass
which demands that you pay close attention in order to be able to carry on your
part of the service, the Gregorian service where the clergy and the choir did
most of the work, you sat immersed in sound and sight and thought your
thoughts, shaped consciously and unconsciously by the explicitly religious
environment.
I was no longer depressed about
being gay. But as I sat there during the liturgy of the word, all sung in
Latin, my mind wandered and I looked around. Over the main altar was a slightly
larger-than-life size carving of Jesus crucified. Although it was carved from
wood, it was covered with gilt and looked a bit like gold plastic, to be
candid. It was not my favorite bit of religious art. But as I sat looking at
it, all of a sudden I saw that the arms of Jesus were not only stretched out on
the cross to die. They were stretched out to reach out, to reach out and
embrace the whole world.
And that included me. Homosexual me.
In an instant I felt that God loved me. Loved me just the way I was. It didn’t
matter that I was not the perfect little boy I had always tried to be, that
whole best-little-boy-in-the-world trap that so many gay men fall into
headlong. I was okay and God was okay with that.
And it seemed to me that what was
going on in that place, at that time, with those people, that Mass was the most
important thing in the world. I had to be part of it.
What little burden I was still
carrying around with me lifted, and when the collection plate came around, I
put in all I had in my wallet. Ironically it was three dollars, the lack of
which had brought me to that church for the first time with those girls who
told me it was best not to become Catholic. [A story for another day.]
When we left church, I turned to
John and asked him what you had to do to become Catholic.
He looked at me strangely.
“I don’t know. Be born to Catholic
parents?”
He did tell me to ask another guy
who lived down the hall from us, someone who planned to become a priest. When I
got back to the dorm, I tracked him down and he told me to just go talk to Fr.
Ed about it.
And my life changed.
The following week when I met with
the counselor, I explained all that had happened. He listened patiently, as he
did to every ridiculous thing I told him. He asked a few questions to see if I
understood what being a priest would mean. He wanted to know in particular if I
was trying to avoid the whole issue of my sexuality by opting for a celibate
career path.
I assured him that I did not. I was
doing this for all the right reasons, out of the purity of my heart and my love
for God. He may not have bought it, but he didn’t press me on it. He did
continue to ask the question from time to time, but I was in my own little
happy cloud. It wasn’t until some thirty years later that the question returned
to haunt me.
I did go talk to Fr. Ed. I
discovered that the Catholic Church, unlike the Church of Christ, did not just
let you jump up and say baptize me and send me to seminary. They took things a
bit more slowly. For one thing, I would have to continue taking the classes
each week. When spring terms came, I would need to continue to take classes. I
would also need to find a baptismal sponsor, someone who would be expected to
accompany me to class each week. That person would be a resource to help answer
questions that I might not think of in class. He would also stand as my sponsor
when I did enter the church at the end of the school year.
I asked Rich, who had also been my
roommate freshman year. He reluctantly agreed, and I have to admit he came to
class with me throughout the spring term even though I am sure there were
things he would much rather be doing on Monday nights. When I was finally
baptized, his parents and his own godparents attended the ceremony and took us
out for a nice dinner afterward.
I felt good about doing this, but I
dreaded telling my parents. If you had been raised in the Church of Christ in
East Texas in those days, becoming Catholic was probably worse than becoming
Muslim. When I went home for spring break, I put it off for a long as I could.
The entire conversation with my mother was this:
“I’m going to become Catholic.”
“No, you’re not. You’ve got more
sense.”
“Yes, I am. I’m taking instruction
and am entering the church in June.”
Silence.
My mother told me years later that
she knew when I became Catholic that I would become a priest. She also told me
that she blamed herself – being a mother, that is part of the job – for me
becoming Catholic. Why? Because she let me go off to Michigan State instead of
keeping me safe and stifled in Huntsville with my friends at Sam Houston
State.
The conversation with my father took
place in the car while he was driving me to Houston Intercontinental Airport to
fly back to Michigan. The transcript of that conversation:
“I’m going to become Catholic.”
“What? You’re going to let some old
man in Rome decide if you’re going to heaven?”
“That’s not how it works.”
Silence.
On June 6, 1970 I and about a dozen
other students entered the Catholic Church at St. John Student Parish in East
Lansing. We were each asked to bring something to be taken up to the altar with
the bread and wine during the procession with gifts for consecration, something to symbolize ourselves
and our new status. I contributed a thin copy of Miguel de Unamuno’s San Manuel Bueno, martir. It was a book
we had read in one of my Spanish classes, the story of a village priest who
lives a quietly heroic life serving his people. They all think of him a saint,
and after his death he is being considered for beatification, a step towards
canonization. The narrator knows that Manuel lived his life the way he did
because he thought it was the right thing to do, even though he did not believe
in the resurrection. The internal conflict created by his desire to live a holy
life, which he did, and his inability to accept all of the church’s teachings
contributed to the physical decline that led to his death.
The book had touched me when we read
it because it spoke to the ambiguity of life, of the value of taking a stand on
principles and of going ahead even if you didn’t understand everything. I had
already decided to become a priest, and I knew at some level that I would be
like Manuel Bueno, trying to do the right thing but not completely able to believe
everything the church taught.
If I were to ever go through the
canonical process whereby the church takes away my priesthood – don’t worry, I
won’t explain any of that [As it turns out, I did not have to go through the full process. Marrying Tom was enough to get me booted!]– the fact that I received baptism in this uncertain
way would probably count towards invalidating all sort of things. I did it
willingly and knowingly, but I did it knowing that there were gaps.
---------------------
In a world of ironies, that clip art up there, symbols of baptism and confirmation, was something Tom designed back when he was head of the RCIA program at the parish in Hyde Park. (RCIA is the process adults go through to enter the Catholic Church.) He did a series of images related to the steps of RCIA and posted them online to be used free by anyone who wanted them for handouts, bulletin announcements and so on. When I entered the church, the full RCIA program was not yet in place, but the process I underwent was based on what was being developed, a sort of precursor.
9 comments:
Thank you for this extract that explains with candor and charity a crucial episode in your life. I shall read it again (probably two or three times) and think about it.
Quite separately, I thought that the Council of Trent decreed (among much else) that the personal transgressions of a priest did not affect the validity of his celebration of the sacraments. So, if your marriage to Tom barred you from actually serving as a priest, am I right that you can still celebrate mass?
Roderick
I really appreciate you sharing your "history", I enjoyed reading it. Everyone's life is different but some times we share part of the same path. I grew up in a very rural area, was born into a Canadian-Irish family (so therefore very Catholic), became well educated and an still a Catholic.
Roderick,
"You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek." See Hebrews 7:17-21
Assuming for the moment that my ordination was valid [and the canonical assumption is that it was], I could celebrate Mass and validly confect the sacrament, if I did so properly and with the intention to do what the church does. Such an act, however, would be illicit, since I lack permission from a bishop to do so.
[Liturgical/canonical humor: What is the difference between an invalid Mass and an illicit Mass? If it is invalid, Jesus doesn't come. If it is illicit, he comes, but he's not happy.]
There are interpretations that such a Mass would be illicit AND invalid, because the fact that I do so outside legitimate communion with the bishops means I cannot have the proper intention to confect a sacrament that is of its nature an expression of that communion.
At any rate, I would not and do not celebrate Mass.
In case of a dire emergency (in case of danger of death) and in the absence of another priest, I would be willing to hear the confession of someone and grant absolution for his/her peace of mind. In that case, in fact, the church permits me to do so, the needs of the person near death trumping all other considerations. There is even a handy Latin phrase -- ecclesia supplet -- which means the church supplies for any defect in my situation in order to provide for the sacramental needs of the person asking for my help. [See Code of Canon Law (1983) 144.1]
Until such a case comes my way -- something less likely than which I cannot conceive -- I am not a sacramental minister.
Michael, I did not mean to be intrusive or to suggest that you would celebrate mass (rather to ask if you still can). I find the requirement about "right intention" exceedingly odd, because the hierarchy (starting with the bishop) can condemn anything they don't like on that ground - prosecutor, jury and judge in their own case. As a former lawyer, I am know about the "invalid" and "illicit" through the traditional laws about capacity to wed (marriages are illicit but valid in some cases). And here I go again - isn't "extreme unction" part and parcel of the final rites or is there a bar to your giving that even in the case of imminent danger of death?
Roderick
Roderick,
I would not want to imply that I think the system is just or perfect in all its particulars. Sadly we have seen all too well what tragedies can occur when a bishop (for that matter, any person in authority in any institution) acts as prosecutor/jury/judge when ruling on cases in which he has a personal stake. Fortunately the present pontiff has recently tightened church discipline to deal with bishops who mismanage such situations.
I could in theory give final rites including not only penance but anointing, but the chances of me having sacred oils on my person or ready access to vegetable oil to bless and the booklet with all the ritual are pretty much non-existent. (Yes, I could wing it, but ...) Confession or at least contrition on the part of the dying person and the giving of absolution by the priest are the important parts.
There is some historical evidence of laity acting as the priest in extraordinary cases of this sort, but that discussion would take us far afield. At any rate, even in such a strong sacramental tradition as the Catholic one, there is a tradition of "baptism by desire" and "communion of desire" for those who desire a sacrament which is unavailable to them at the moment of death. In cases such as this -- dying penitent without access to confessor -- an analogy could be drawn. And we must never forget that God is not bound by the parameters of sacramental administration when it comes to bestowing grace. A fact for which we all might be grateful.
I imagine in this, as in almost all pastoral questions, you can find Catholic clergy who would hold differing opinions. What I say here is my own understanding, which may well be false or at least outdated.
This one I want to give careful reading to; I will reply anon......
I'm not a believer and, in fact, am sometimes angered by the terrible things people do in the name of their religions. However, I realize that, if there were no religion, they'd do those terrible things in the name of something else. And I'm always grateful to learn from enlightened believers like you. If all believers were like you, you'd get no complaints from me.
Mitchell,
I would not want to give the impression that I am in any usual sense a [Christian or Catholic] believer today. I try to be respectful of the beliefs of others -- not always an easy task! -- and I am intentionally circumspect about my own beliefs. Excerpts from my memoirs reflect what I thought/believed/hoped at the time of the events described.
When attempting to explain Catholic belief and practice, I willingly suspend disbelief, in order to present what the church herself, to the best of my knowledge, believes. I draw on the example of one of my professors at Michigan State, a Baptist minister who taught courses in Buddhism, Hinduism and other Eastern religions/cultures. He always did this from their own perspective, so well that he was sometimes accused of being Hindu/Buddhist/Whatever.
As I have pointed out before, plenty of folks who consider themselves staunch Christian or Catholic believers would take issue even with my attempts to be fair. I can but try.
You do a great job, Michael. Thanks!
Post a Comment